West Michigan businesses are navigating a steady stream of change (Boomgaard, 2025; Limbaugh, 2025; The Right Place, 2025), including rapid adoption of new technologies, external policy and regulatory changes, workforce reductions, and shifting market conditions. At the same time, the region has seen continued investment, organizational expansion, and strategic initiatives aimed at sustained growth. Together, these forces define a West Michigan business landscape characterized by both constraint and opportunity. For employees, translating these competing forces into daily work experiences may be challenging. These dual pressures can manifest as ambiguous expectations, increased demands, and uncertainty about stability and future opportunities. Such experiences naturally evoke emotions in employees that may range from pride and hope to anxiety and frustration (Weiss & Cropanzano, 1996).

Historically, emotions were viewed as the opposite of logic and something to suppress in the name of efficiency and productivity. However, this mindset is rooted in the Industrial Revolution’s view of workers as interchangeable parts and no longer fits today’s workplaces. West Michigan business leaders have increasingly emphasized the importance of employee capabilities that cannot be automated, such as emotional intelligence and relationship-building skills (Stotts, 2025). Success now depends not on minimizing employees’ emotions, but on recognizing that emotional awareness and connection are essential to how West Michigan businesses serve customers, lead teams, and sustain long-term performance. Work is emotional because work matters to people (Smith & Grandey, 2025). When employees care about what they do and the people they serve and work alongside, emotions naturally follow.

Although many organizations now recognize the value of positive emotions at work, negative emotions are just as important to understand. Frustration, anxiety, and sadness are common in professional life because work involves challenge, uncertainty, and loss. Leaders play a central role in shaping how employees experience negative emotions by setting the tone for whether these emotions are acknowledged or dismissed. Through everyday interactions, such as providing feedback, managing conflict, or leading through change, leaders influence how employees make sense of demanding situations. Research suggests that leaders who recognize and regulate their own emotions, while helping employees do the same, are better equipped to support employee performance and wellbeing (Smith & Grandey, 2025). As West Michigan organizations navigate ongoing change and growth, this article offers practical, research-based strategies to help managers respond constructively to negative emotions at work.

The Message Behind Negative Emotions

Negative emotions are not just reactions; they are signals that reveal how employees experience their work (Van Kleef, 2009). For example, anger, fear, and sadness are universal emotions that communicate distinct messages (Lazarus, 1991). Anger at work often reflects a sense of unfairness or a perceived obstacle to goal attainment. Fear suggests that employees sense uncertainty or a potential threat that they do not know how to manage. Sadness reflects the loss of something meaningful in the workplace. For leaders, understanding these emotions can provide valuable insight into what employees need to perform their best. Attending to negative emotions helps managers identify misunderstandings, clarify expectations, and choose strategies that motivate rather than discourage. The key is to treat emotions as data about employees’ experiences, not as disruptions to be dismissed or matched with emotion in return.

Just as negative emotions carry information, expressing them also serves an important social purpose. People often share their negative emotions to feel understood and supported. When employees express emotions like anger, fear, or sadness to a manager, they are often seeking validation that their experiences make sense, and they are not alone in it (Williams et al., 2025). Leaders’ responses to these moments carry significant weight because of their status and influence (Smith & Grandey, 2025). When leaders acknowledge and respond to employees’ emotions with empathy, they build trust and respect, which fosters relationships that sustain motivation and long-term commitment. In contrast, dismissing or ignoring employees’ emotions can leave them feeling isolated and weaken the very relationships on which effective leadership depends. Negative emotions and difficult conversations, when handled constructively, can become powerful opportunities to build stronger workplace connections (Williams et al., 2025).

Helping Employees Navigate Difficult Emotions

For West Michigan leaders, research shows that there are multiple ways to help employees navigate difficult emotions at work, with some approaches proving more effective than others (Bradley et al., 2024). One effective starting point is genuine listening to understand what employees are feeling and why, followed by acknowledging and validating those emotions (Williams et al., 2025). Validation means recognizing and legitimizing another person’s emotion as understandable. For example, validation can be as simple as saying, “I can see why that was frustrating.” Importantly, validation does not require leaders to agree with or condone an employee’s behavior; rather, it signals respect for the person’s reality and a willingness to understand their perspective. When used effectively, validation can reduce employees’ distress and support their ability to better regulate their own emotions (Bradley et al., 2024). Using validation effectively requires emotional literacy, or the ability to appropriately recognize and label the emotion that someone is expressing (Smith & Grandey, 2025).

Sometimes leader validation alone is enough. In other cases, leaders may need to address the source of employees’ emotions directly (Bradley et al., 2024; Little et al., 2016). This can involve situation modification by making tangible changes or collaborating with employees to identify adjustments that reduce emotional strain. For example, a leader might redistribute tasks, adjust deadlines, or clarify priorities. When a situation cannot be easily changed, leaders can instead facilitate cognitive change by reframing how employees interpret a situation to lessen its emotional impact. For instance, a leader might help someone view feedback as an opportunity for growth rather than personal failure or emphasize how a challenging task creates value for others. Research consistently shows that cognitive change is a powerful tool for managing one’s own and others’ emotions to promote adaptability, reduce distress, and improve wellbeing (Smith & Grandey, 2025; Webb et al., 2012).

Attentional deployment is another strategy that can be used when a situation cannot be directly changed. In this approach, a leader redirects an employee’s focus away from the emotional trigger. For example, a leader might use light humor or encourage a brief mental break. Research suggests that attentional deployment has mixed effectiveness (Little et al., 2016; Webb et al., 2012), as it redirects attention without addressing the root cause of the emotion and may still leave employees feeling unacknowledged. As a follow up to any emotion management attempt, leaders can also connect employees with sources of formal and informal support. Formal support may include resources offered through employee benefits, such as employee assistance programs or counseling services. Informal support can come from maintaining open, ongoing conversations that reinforce a sense of connection and care (Williams et al., 2025).

It is equally important to recognize the approaches that tend to be less effective in managing employees’ emotions. Two common but counterproductive strategies are suppression and invalidation (Bradley et al., 2024; Little et al., 2016). Suppression involves telling someone to hold back or hide their emotions. For example, a manager might say, “Let’s stay professional and not get emotional about this.” Invalidation, in contrast, involves minimizing or rejecting another person’s emotional experience. For example, a leader might say, “You should not be frustrated by this; it is not a big deal.” With so many competing demands, leaders may understandably try to avoid the time and discomfort of discussing negative emotions by using suppression and invalidation. Although these responses may be well-intentioned attempts to maintain order, they can undermine trust, disrupt self-regulation, and intensify distress, which creates a ripple effect to harm both employee wellbeing and performance.

Conclusion

As ongoing change reshapes West Michigan’s business landscape (Boomgaard, 2025; Limbaugh, 2025; The Right Place, 2025), managing employees’ emotions has become a central part of effective leadership (Smith & Grandey, 2025). This article highlighted why negative emotions at work deserve thoughtful attention and outlined research-based strategies West Michigan leaders can use to respond constructively when they arise. At the same time, helping others navigate difficult emotions is effortful work. The sustained demands of listening, empathizing, and regulating emotional interactions can contribute to fatigue and burnout over time (Smith & Grandey, 2025). To lead sustainably, West Michigan leaders should also attend to their own emotional health by reflecting on challenging interactions, seeking support from peers and mentors, and engaging in activities that help them reset and recharge. By approaching emotional support as both a leadership practice and a resource that must be replenished, West Michigan leaders can better support their teams while sustaining their own wellbeing.

Boomgaard, J. (2025, December 15). Lost icons, new venues and data centers: 10 stories to watch for 2026. Crain’s Grand Rapids Business. https://www.crainsgrandrapids.com/news/economic-development/lost-icons-new-venues-and-data-centers-10-stories-to-watch-for-2026/

Bradley, C. M., Greer, L. L., Trinh, E., & Sanchez-Burks, J. (2024). Responding to the emotions of others at work: A review and integrative theoretical framework for the effects of emotion-response strategies on work-related outcomes. Academy of Management Annals, 18(1), 3-43.

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.

Limbaugh, D. (2025, December 9). Downtown Grand Rapids construction investment hits nearly $1 billion, breaking previous record. WGVU News. https://www.wgvunews.org/news/2025-12-09/downtown-grand-rapids-construction-investment-hits-nearly-1-billion-breaking-previous-record

Little, L. M., Gooty, J., & Williams, M. (2016). The role of leader emotion management in leader–member exchange and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 85-97.

Smith, D. D., & Grandey, A. A. (2025). Emotionally Charged: How to Lead in the New World of Work. Oxford University Press.

Stotts, K. (2025, June 12). From risk to resilience: How West Michigan’s leaders are future-proofing their workforce. TalentFirst. https://talentfirst.net/from-risk-to-resilience-how-west-michigans-leaders-are-future-proofing-their-workforce/

The Right Place (2025, December 15). Inside the region’s business climate: Key trends from a recent retention blitz. https://www.rightplace.org/news/inside-the-regions-business-climate-key-trends-from-a-recent-retention-blitz

Van Kleef, G. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184-188.

Webb, T. L., Miles, E., & Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 775-808.

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.

Williams, C. E., Thomas, J. S., Gooty, J., & Dunne, D. D. (2025). Negative emotions, difficult conversations and leader–follower relationships. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 98(1), e12566.